Projects Funded for David Zilberman

2016-2017

Using Micro Geoengineering for Adaptation to Climate Change in Agriculture

2015-2016

How Did California Respond to the 2012-Present Drought and How Should the California Water System Adapt to Climate Change?

Abstract

<p><strong>Specific Objectives of the Project</strong> Objective 1: Conduct 4 surveys on California institutions and how the drought changed their behavior: 1) A survey at the water district level on sources of water (surface, ground, and purchased), pricing and allocation of water, and water use by farmers in the three years prior to the drought and during the drought; 2) A survey at the county/farm level on farmers’ technology choice and adoption and their changes in practices in response to the drought; 3) A survey obtaining data from the Department of Water Resources (DWR) and the Bureau of Reclamation on allocation of water to different projects and activities; 4) A survey obtaining data from the State on production and earnings of different crops in different counties.</p> <p>Objective 2: Expand the conceptual framework on optimal management and utilization of water under climate change to interpret possible outcomes of the drought as described below.</p> <p>Objective 3: Analyze the data to assess how the drought affected crop production and water use patterns within and between sectors, and obtain estimates of the economic impact of the drought.</p> <p>Objective 4: Using the expanded conceptual framework and the empirical estimates, analyze policy implications for the California water system to adapt to climate change.</p> <p>Objective 5: Produce an outreach program to disseminate findings.</p> <p><strong>Project Report/Summary of Results</strong> California agriculture experienced high profits during the drought period, reaching record earnings. The main driver was high output prices and in some cases higher yields, especially in crops irrigated with subsurface drip irrigation (with the drought, weeds couldn’t survive). California farmers adapted to the drought by fallowing close to 1 million acres of land (out of close to 10 million of acres total). However, the drought was a period of transition where the acreage associated with high value crops increased, while the acreage of lower value crops, like cotton and grains, declined. The high earnings of agricultural production were also associated with water transfers at very high prices (up to $1,000 per acre foot in some regions). Another response to the drought was a significant increase in groundwater use, which have threatened the long-term viability of some groundwater aquifers.</p> <p>A third mechanism of adaptation was a further increase in use of drip irrigation and other conservation technologies as well as increased reliance on irrigation scheduling and automated and optimized irrigation systems. Forty percent of the agricultural land in California uses drip irrigation and a significant percentage of this use is subsurface drip systems. We estimate that the use of water conservation technologies increases gross and net income of California agriculture by 2.6-7.4%.</p> <p>Our research suggests that to maintain sustainability of California’s water supply, groundwater use must be regulated based on sound economic and hydrological principles. Further, the use of recycled water can increase supply by up to 3 million acre feet of water, out of a current total use of 44 million acre feet per year. The challenge is to develop a sound conveyance system. In addition, the use of desalination is warranted. Finally, there is much more room to improve water pricing.</p>

2012-2013

Voting for GMOs in California

Abstract

<p><strong>Specific Objectives of the Project</strong> Understanding factors that affect voting for the labeling of pesticides or the banning of pesticides in California.</p> <p><strong>Project Summary</strong> This project developed a theory explaining consumer choices regarding the labeling of genetically modified (GM) food and applied it to Proposition 37. Proposition 37 originated from an attempt to stall the advances of GM food and biotechnology in the California, drawing on the perception that there is significant public suspicion against the technology and rising awareness and concern about food safety. The initial survey of the public mood in this study suggested that there was potential for proponents of the proposition to succeed. Furthermore, there is a large body of literature in economics and other fields that suggests that some consumers may be willing to pay significant premiums for non-GM food. However, in the end, the proposition failed. Two main issues seemed to carry the outcome of the vote: (1) Flaws in the writing of the proposition created suspicion of its intent. (2) More important, the claim that implementation would raise food prices for Californians by $400/year per household caught people’s attention. To some extent, this was a real experiment on willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid GM. This experiment showed that, among the majority of the populace, the WTP was low. That is, while some perceived objections are widely held, they do not run deep. Once the public realized the cost of restricting GM, they lost enthusiasm, suggesting that increased education on the benefits of GM and, more important, the cost of blocking its use might bear fruit and help to relax the policies that regulate and restrict GM in other markets.</p> <p>If the public faces a serious trade-off and is exposed to sound argumentation as to why a regulatory requirement is excessive, people will vote against restrictions. This bodes well for the future of GM if its proponents can make a strong case for it, given that California has tended to support environmental causes. For example, California is one of few states that has implemented climate-change policies. Another lesson might be simply that money talks, and large contributions to political causes may sway the public, possibly even against sound policy. But the elections in 2012 demonstrated that large spending does not always guarantee a win.</p>

2011-2012

Assessing the Climate Change Impacts of Agricultural Biotechnology Adoption

2010-2011

Energy Prices and the Financial Crisis: Application to California Land Use

Abstract

<p>The financial crisis originated from a large volume of defaults of real-estate owners. These defaults devastated the financial institutions that owned the mortgages or provided insurance against defaults. But what caused these defaults? While there is a consensus that low interest rates and easy credit fueled the crisis, we argue that the high energy prices ignited it. Using data from California, we show that individuals in communities located farther from employment centers have much higher rates of defaults than those closer to centers and, on average, have low incomes. Thus, the doubling of energy prices during 2005-2008 caused many individuals in commuting com munities to default on mortgages as the housing-price bubble burst and they hit their budgetary constraints.</p>

2009-2010

Assessment of Agriculture's Potential Contributions to California Climate Action

Agricultural Biotechnology Across Space and Time: An Analysis of Intensive and Extensive Margin Effect

Abstract

<p>Genetically modified (GM) varieties were introduced in the mid-1990s, mostly for pest control, and have been adopted widely for corn, soybeans, cotton, and canola. Using data on acreage with and without this technology as well as on output at the national level over a period of 20 years in 125 countries, we were able to isolate the impacts of technology, changes over time, and differences in productivity among countries. We have found that the adoption of GM technology has increased the per-acre yield of cotton more than 100 percent in developing countries and by more than 20 percent in developed countries. The per-acre yield of corn increased by 50 percent in developing countries and by 15 percent in developed countries. The acreage of soybeans more than doubled. Thus, GM technologies have contributed significantly to the reduction in food prices and have enabled growing food demands to be met.</p>

2006-2007

Adoption and Potential Precision Farming in California Agriculture

2002-2003

Reexamination of the Economics of Pest Resistance

2001-2002

Adoption of Information Technology in California Agriculture

2000-2001

Adoption of Information Technology in California Agriculture

1999-2000

Animal Waste and Contract Farming

1998-1999

The Economics of Precision Agriculture with Application to California